
MSV's
Community Restoration Program
Marks
20 Years of Support, Advocacy
Men
Stopping Violence will celebrate its 25th anniversary this year,
but 2007 also marks the 20th anniversary of MSV's innovative Community
Restoration Program (CRP).
Begun
in 1987 as a program for men who had completed MSV's 24-week men's
intervention program, CRP has evolved into a community education
and advocacy team committed to the work of ending violence against
women. The group's original intent was to offer men who had finished
the program ongoing connection and support and opportunities to
be of service to Men Stopping Violence. CRP continues that mission
but since its founding has taken on a greater advocacy role in the
community.

Members
of CRP met with U.S. Sen. Johnny Isakson
(third from left) and an aide in 2005 about the
reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act.
'(CRP)
allows me to reinforce my commitment to treat all folks, including
my partner and all women, with fairness and dignity and trust,
said Bill Kirksey, co-leader of CRP. Second, it sets an example
for the men in my life. And third, it allows me to work
toward creating a safe and more just world.
CRP
began as Third Phase, a program for who had finished the 24-week
program. They began meeting to continue to work on their own issues
and to assist Men Stopping Violence with the orientation sessions
that all men attend before entering the education program. In the
mid-1990s, Third Phase became the Community Restitution Program
to reflect a new focus on intervening with men in the community.
In
2004, the name was changed again this time to the Community Restoration
Program to emphasize the group's work for restorative justice.
"What
we were saying was that part of changing yourself requires changing
the environment you live in by restoring the climate of safety that
is destroyed when men abuse women, said Dick Bathrick, MSV Director
of Programs and co-leader of CRP. "We went back to CRP men
assisting our staff in educating men during orientations to our
classes, but
they now had more choices about ways to work in the community.
Presently,
CRP men act to create personal, cultural and political change through
a range of activities. They make presentations to groups in the
community. They work with Men Stopping Violence programs, such as
orientation and the Because We Have Daughters® campaign, for
which they recruit dads who want to make their communities safer
for their daughters. And they monitor relevant state and federal
legislation, meet with lawmakers, and even testify at legislative
hearings during sessions of the Georgia General Assembly.
The
legislative work began about two years ago in response to women
advocates identifying a need for men to be involved with policy
and legislation around the issue of violence against women.
It
is crucial that men stand shoulder to shoulder with women in this
work, and CRP is doing just that, said Kirsten Rambo, Executive
Director of the Georgia Commission on Family Violence. I have very
much appreciated the men of CRP speaking out against violence against
women. Because of the scarcity of men willing to speak out in this
way, their voices have had a real impact, particularly in the legislative
process.
CRP
men now speak in favor of pending state legislation that promotes
safety for women and against bills that do not. In 2005, men in
the CRP helped organize and implement a campaign to support reauthorization
of the federal Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). CRP members formed
the core of a Georgia group called Men Supporting VAWA, which lobbied
for passage of the reauthorization bill by meeting with Georgia
congressmen. The bill passed and was signed into law in early 2006.

CRP
members with the staff of U.S. Rep. Sanford Bishop in 2005.
During
the current session of the Georgia General Assembly, CRP members
have turned their attention to a piece of introduced legislation
that calls for a presumption of joint custody in child custody cases.
Men Stopping Violence and other advocacy groups working on the issue
of violence against women are opposed to presumptive joint custody,
because many cases of contested divorce involve violence against
women and children, and joint custody gives perpetrators of violence
access to victims of violence. CRP members and others have talked
with legislators and testified at hearings for the bill. Since being
introduced, the language of the legislation has been changed.
'The
bill currently has the best interest of the child' as the default,
and we are very pleased to have done some work up front to get some
legislators to say that, said Kirksey. We're trying to testify
in hearings and keep it from being amended.
Being
able to take direct action has been energizing to men in CRP and
reflects Men Stopping Violence's commitment to widescale social
change. Men in CRP have found that being involved in planning and
carrying out initiatives around policy change and lawmaking also
helps them to stay true to the original intent of the group when
it formed in 1987. Speaking out on the issues that affect women's
safety means that the men in the group have to continually examine
and re-examine their own beliefs and behaviors about violence in
general and violence against women in particular.
We
have to support each other in the process of understanding legislative
issues that affect women, said Greg Loughlin, a CRP member who
also works for the Georgia Commission on Family Violence. CRP's
work around the joint custody issue, for example, calls on the men
to be educated about its implications. We talk to each other about
our challenges and about really getting an understanding of why
shared parenting is bad for battered women. Being able to articulate
that and practicing articulating that to other men helps us. And
it gives us something to share that doesn't denigrate women.
The
need for support was really brought home to Loughlin while they
were working with Men Supporting VAWA.
I
felt good about it because I was with four or five other men who
also felt strongly about this, he said. I don't think that any
of us would have gone to do it alone, and if we had gone
alone we wouldn't have been successful. When so many of the men
that legislators hear from are against women's issues, it really
makes a big impact when they see men advocating for the issues that
other men aren't advocating for.
 |